Loyal Pet Cremation PH Draws Public Attention Amid Growing Concerns Over Pet Aftercare Services
As controversy continues surrounding Ahjay Paws Aftercare Pet Crematorium, another pet cremation provider has been named in a social media post alleging improper handling of animal remains.
A Facebook account identified as Dra Mg publicly raised concerns involving Loyal Pet Cremation PH and an individual identified in the post as Dr. Kean Maniego.
According to the post, animal remains that were allegedly not completely cremated may have been discarded or buried instead of undergoing further cremation.
The complainant further alleged that instructions concerning the disposal of these remains came from the individual named.
These statements are allegations made by the complainant and must not be interpreted as established facts.
The complainant also expressed concern about the remains of her beloved Chow Chow, Suwail, whom she had cared for for more than a decade. She questioned whether her pet had received the cremation services expected.
WHAT HAS ACTUALLY BEEN ESTABLISHED?
At present, the material available for this report consists of a publicly circulated Facebook post.
It does not independently establish:
- Whether animal remains were improperly disposed of.
- Whether any particular employee received instructions to do so.
- Whether the complainant’s pet was improperly cremated.
- Whether Loyal Pet Cremation PH or the individual named committed any violation.
The claimed ownership or management connection also requires independent verification.
No conclusion of wrongdoing can responsibly be drawn from the social media post alone.
The establishment and individuals concerned must be afforded an opportunity to respond, present their records, and address the allegations.
WHY THE ALLEGATIONS DESERVE ATTENTION
The separate controversy involving Ahjay Paws Aftercare Pet Crematorium has already raised serious concerns about transparency and accountability in the Philippine pet aftercare industry.
However, the existence of allegations against one provider does not establish wrongdoing by another. Each complaint must be evaluated independently and supported by credible evidence.
If a formal complaint is filed, the appropriate authorities should examine relevant cremation records, procedures, and other available evidence before determining whether any violation occurred.
AN INDUSTRY THAT NEEDS GREATER TRANSPARENCY
For veterinary professionals, these developments reinforce the importance of exercising due diligence before referring pet owners to third-party cremation providers.
For pet owners, they highlight the importance of obtaining proper documentation and understanding how their pets’ remains will be handled.
Public accountability is important, but so are fairness, evidence, and due process.
An allegation deserves examination. It does not automatically establish guilt.
The Philippine pet aftercare industry needs greater transparency, appropriate oversight, and credible investigations—not trial by social media.
Because justice must protect both grieving pet owners and those who may be unfairly accused.
Editor’s Note: This report documents allegations appearing in a publicly circulated Facebook post. It does not independently verify or endorse those allegations. No official finding of wrongdoing has been provided in the materials reviewed. The author does not assert that Loyal Pet Cremation PH or any named individual has committed an unlawful act. Any response, clarification, or independently verifiable evidence from the parties concerned should be considered in subsequent reporting.
Source: Facebook post attributed to Dra Mg, November 4, 2026.
Dr. Geoff Carullo is a Fellow and the current President of the Philippine College of Canine Practitioners.
Sharing this helps others understand what it really means to be a vet. Like and follow if you’re with us.





























